In a recent speech Hillary Rodham Clinton gave while on the campaign trail, she compared Republicans to terrorists presumably because many of them oppose Planned Parenthood’s (PP) practice of selling baby parts and fetal tissue for a profit. First of all, that she doesn’t see this as morally wrong is troublesome and speaks volumes about her character. For Clinton, though, to start name-calling because she disagrees with the way most people, let alone Republicans, feel about murdering unborn, and sometimes just-born and intact, babies is just mind-blowing. Name-calling is a normal tactic for liberals, to be sure.
“Extreme views about women, we expect that from some of the terrorist groups,” Clinton decried. “We expect that from people who don’t want to live in the modern world. But it’s a little hard to take coming from Republicans who want to be the president of the United States, yet they espouse out-of-date and out-of-touch policies.”
To Hillary, anyone who doesn’t fall for aborting fetuses and selling their body parts under the guise of “research” and “women’s health” are more like terrorists than terrorists themselves, I suppose. Anyone who doesn’t support the scam PP has going on is apparently not living in the 21st century and not moving forward.
I beg to differ. I say having views like that is living in the dark ages. If anyone ever doubted Hillary’s left-leaning liberalism, it’s right out in the open for all to see if they care to look. But the fascinating thing about it is that she is given a pass by many people, and of course the mainstream media, because she is a Clinton, and Clintons are like Teflon.
It’s bad enough that she is milking this thoroughly debunked and phony Republican war on women for all it is worth. Now she is railing against Citizens United, a conservative grass-roots organization whose interest is seeing that justice be served. Of course if justice is to be served, Hillary Rodham Clinton would be serving a very long prison sentence in a federal penitentiary for the misdeeds she’s done.
Still sore from the damaging expose film Citizens United made about her, Clinton told an audience in Iowa that she would seek a constitutional amendment to overturn a 2010 decision which allows 501(c) organizations to spend money opposing or supporting candidates for office.
“We need to fix our dysfunctional political system and get unaccountable money out of it once and for all, even if that takes a constitutional amendment,” she said.
Given the scandal the Clintons presently see themselves embroiled in, it seems ironic and hypocritical that she’d take that position. This all stems, however from the fact that under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Citizens United recently requested documents pertaining to Clinton’s business dealings. No wonder she’s railing about them.
This could all be for naught, however, if Congress would hasten to do its job and properly prosecute Hillary Clinton for her role in Benghazi and finally expose the inner workings of the massive email scandal which continues to grow exponentially. Although, if she is found guilty before the 2016 presidential election, it’s very possible President Obama would pardon her upon his leaving office. Ideally, she would be found guilty then sentenced after a new Republican president is sworn in.